Hello there,
Your work and nice and clean and the survey data could easily be distinguished. Although, I suggest merging the GibbonSightings_Survey 1 the GibbonSightings_Survey 2 file as instructed in the module. Anyway, everything is nice with the color and the layering. Keep up the good work!
Module 3 is much easier compared to the previous modules. It’s also necessary to do some reading to figure out which SRS to utilize. I still struggling in finding the colour contrast. But all in all, I made a good and better output.
It make it clear and nice to see. I’ll find it very presentable.
Yes, the instructions are an easy guide, but for first timer, configuring the software can become a task of few minutes. Overall its a good system to learn and broadcast ecological info.
Thanks.
In this module 3 which is about the angular coordinates which dealing with the comparison of the X and Y. In this module where we gonna do a comparing between the threats evidence and the sighting surveys. Where I find it easier one than the previous module and I find really fun in changing the colors to emphasize the comparison of the data being imposed to this project.
Thank youu!
I found the module a tad bit challenging than the other two. As a beginner my understanding of how to select a suitable SRS was a bit difficult but thanks to Lucy’s steps it was easier to follow and understand. Enjoying the course!
Yes you’ll get it …just keep trying and practicing 
It does! Thank you very much for the explanation 
I understand that this module was about the different datum, SRS, how to transfer field data into QGIS using CSV files and how to make sense of them in QGIS. However amidst the process I still can’t have the same result as the others. To be honest I am confused. But I am trying and ain’t giving up. In this module, this one is what I’ve got. If anyone could teach me how to fix it, the same output as the majority has posted here, I’ll be very glad.
My kind regards.
Thanks you! I added the merged layer over each survey layer so people can see that merged layer has both surveys. You can see the layers I have selected on the left side of the screenshot in the layers window.
I played around with the position of each layer until the points on the Threats evidence were visible you may also change the symbology attributes
Nice colors! And you chose the symbology of the points well. Your two gibbon sightings datasets have very similar symbols (because they represent the same type of data), and are clearly distinguished from the Threats layer.
Personally I chose to keep only the merged gibbon sightings dataset and turned off the original two layers, so all the gibbon sightings points appear the same. It seems appropriate to consider them as a single dataset, although that would depend on what you want to convey with your map! The way you did it is nice, too.
Your work looks great and Precise.
This week’s lesson was very helpful in clarifying what I need to know when integrating different datasets since different layers may use different: Coordinates - lat /long or a projected coordinate system,Map Projections, and different Datums.
Also, i can now describe the difference between geographic and projected spatial reference systems,and setting spatial reference system of a QGIS project now and more.
Thanks
I think I followed the instructions pretty well, and I think I did ok when I wanted to repeat the exercise on my own. But it’s getting quite tricky for me to remember all the steps if I don’t practice. I still don’t think I would be 100% confident to determine which SRS to use for my data and would probably ask my colleagues for advice.
In my assignment, however, I decided to highlight Survey1 and Survey2 in EPSG_3410, and right below them are the merged points.
Great display! I also decided between this and between the individual surveys, and though I have decided on the latter, I totally agree with what you have written.
